What is the NOAEL for Methotrexate?
Methotrexate has 26 NOAEL studies in the database. The lowest reported value is developmental listing type. Source: California Proposition 65.
Also known as: MTX, (2S)-2-[[4-[[(2,4-Diaminopteridin-6-yl)methyl]methylamino]benzoyl]amino]pentanedioic acid, CL 14377, Caditrex, EMT 25299 (+15 more)
CAS 59-05-2
Methotrexate (CAS 59-05-2) is a chemical substance; key hazard signal: IARC Group 3. Key regulatory status: California Proposition 65, 7 regulatory/inventory lists, cosmetic ingredient cross-reference; source data from EPA ToxValDB, EPA CPDat, IARC, CA Prop 65.
Methotrexate is prohibited in EU cosmetics but has active industrial GHS classifications (H301, H315, H319, H340, H360).
CAS, identifiers, formula, and alternate names for the matched substance record.
Carcinogenic hazard classification from IARC monograph evaluations.
| Group | Meaning | Evaluated | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 3 | Not classifiable | 1987 | 26, Sup 7 |
California OEHHA listing status and toxicity category.
| Chemical | Toxicity Type | Cancer | Developmental | Listed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | developmental | No | Yes | - |
Industrial and product-use categories associated with this substance.
Inventory, screening, and regulatory list matches from public chemical databases.
| List | Keyword | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Canada; consumer_product; Substances in Products - Canada (4/2014) | Government of Canada | CPCat |
| pharmaceutical | US International Trade Commission | CPCat |
| pharmaceutical | FDA | United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) |
| OEHHA Proposition 65 (3/2019) | STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY | OEHHA Proposition 65 List |
| Canada; pharmaceutical | DrugBank | DrugBank |
| OEHHA Proposition 65 (1/2023) | California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment | OEHHA Proposition 65 List |
| banned; Europe; Personal care | European Commission | CosIng |
Toxicology endpoints rendered from public NOAEL study rows.
| Value | Unit | Endpoint | Route | Species | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQEdevelopmental | listing type | California Proposition 65 listing | - | - | California Proposition 65 |
| SQEdevelopmental | listing type | California Proposition 65 listing | - | - | California Proposition 65 |
| SQEdevelopmental | listing type | California Proposition 65 listing | - | - | California Proposition 65 |
| SQEdevelopmental | listing type | California Proposition 65 listing | - | - | California Proposition 65 |
| - | uL/min/10^6 cells | Clint | - | Human | NTP_ICE_adme_parameters |
| YL5FZ2Y5U1 | UNII | FDA UNII substance identifier | - | - | openFDA substances |
| YL5FZ2Y5U1 | UNII | FDA UNII substance identifier | - | - | openFDA substances |
| YL5FZ2Y5U1 | UNII | FDA UNII substance identifier | - | - | openFDA substances |
| YL5FZ2Y5U1 | UNII | FDA UNII substance identifier | - | - | openFDA substances |
| 0.432 | fraction | Fu | - | Human | NTP_ICE_adme_parameters |
| 3 | IARC group | IARC carcinogenicity classification | - | - | IARC Monographs |
| 3 | unitless | IARC group | - | - | NTP_ICE_cancer |
| >135 | mg/kg bw | LD50 | oral | Rat | NTP_ICE_acute_oral |
| =180 | mg/kg bw | LD50 | oral | Rat | NTP_ICE_acute_oral |
| <225 | mg/kg bw | LD50 | oral | Rat | NTP_ICE_acute_oral |
| =0.4 | mg/L | LOEL | environmental | Rat | ToxValDB_ECOTOX |
| =0.8 | mg/L | LOEL | environmental | Rat | ToxValDB_ECOTOX |
| - | unitless | Model Score | - | - | NTP_ICE_endocrine |
| =0.012 | mg/L | NOEC | environmental | Rat | ToxValDB_ECOTOX |
| =0.02 | mg/L | NOEC | environmental | Rat | ToxValDB_ECOTOX |
| =0.025 | mg/L | NOEC | environmental | Rat | ToxValDB_ECOTOX |
| =0.055 | mg/L | NOEC | environmental | Rat | ToxValDB_ECOTOX |
| =0.075 | mg/L | NOEC | environmental | Rat | ToxValDB_ECOTOX |
| =0.1 | mg/L | NOEC | environmental | Rat | ToxValDB_ECOTOX |
| =0.12 | mg/L | NOEC | environmental | Rat | ToxValDB_ECOTOX |
| =0.15 | mg/L | NOEC | environmental | Rat | ToxValDB_ECOTOX |
Showing 26 of 26 studies
Same-CAS cosmetic ingredient record for cross-vertical context.
Same-CAS pharmaceutical records from drug and bioactivity sources.
Methotrexate has 26 NOAEL studies in the database. The lowest reported value is developmental listing type. Source: California Proposition 65.
Methotrexate appears on 6 regulatory/inventory lists including Canada; consumer_product; Substances in Products - Canada (4/2014), pharmaceutical, OEHHA Proposition 65 (3/2019), and 3 more. Source: EPA CPDat.
Methotrexate is classified by IARC as Group 3 — not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans (evaluated 1987). Source: IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans.
Yes, Methotrexate is listed under California Proposition 65 for developmental. Source: California OEHHA Proposition 65.
Yes, Methotrexate is also indexed as a cosmetic ingredient under the name Methotrexate. View the full cosmetic safety profile on the ingredient page for detailed safety data, SCCS opinions, and regulatory status.
Safety data is sourced from EPA ToxValDB, EPA CPDat, EPA DSSTox, IARC Monographs, California Proposition 65, CosIng / Ingredients DB, ChEMBL / DailyMed. All data traces to primary regulatory sources and is updated from official government databases.
Methotrexate is prohibited in EU cosmetics but has active industrial GHS classifications (H301, H315, H319, H340, H360).
Methotrexate also appears in cosmetics, pharmaceutical databases.