Is Citronellol safe in cosmetics?
Citronellol has a safety rating of "MODERATE" in our database. EU status: restricted. US status: permitted.
Also known as: 3,7-Dimethyloct-6-en-1-ol, 6-Octen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, beta-Citronellol, 4-01-00-02188, BRN 1721507 (+6 more)
INCI: CITRONELLOL
Citronellol (CAS 106-22-9) is a cosmetic fragrance functioning as fragrance; antimicrobial. NOAEL 50 mg/kg bw/day (PDF-verified against ToxValDB ECHA IUCLID); EU Regulation 1223/2009 status: restricted, max Declarable EU allergen; labelling required >10 ppm leave-on / >100 ppm rinse-off under Regulation (EU) 2023/1545; IFRA restrictions apply. Industrial safety data is also available in the chemical safety database. Same-CAS public records also appear in industrial chemical safety and pharmaceutical data.
View industrial chemical safety profile for CAS 106-22-9 →
For full compliance data across multiple jurisdictions, use the Substance Compliance tool.
Margin of Safety, dermal absorption, and sensitization profile summaries for Citronellol.
Calculate MoS for your specific formulation with the MoS Calculator.
Pre-calculated NOAEL → SED → MoS audit trail for Citronellol across SCCS product categories, with measured dermal absorption where available.
Contact sensitization data for Citronellol based on clinical patch test studies and IFRA standards.
Source: ESSCA/IVDK
Skin absorption and penetration characteristics of Citronellol, relevant to systemic exposure and MoS calculations.
Source: SCCS/1459/11, IFRA
5 toxicity values from EPA ToxValDB (aggregated from CCTE, HPV, ToxRefDB, IRIS, and other regulatory dossiers).
| Endpoint | Value | Species | Route | Duration | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOEL | =50 mg/kg-day | Rat | oral | subchronic | EFSA |
| LD50 | =2650 mg/kg | Rabbit | dermal | - | ECHA IUCLID |
| LD50 | =3450 mg/kg | Rat | oral | - | ECHA IUCLID |
| LD50 | =2650 mg/kg | Rabbit | dermal | - | ChemIDplus |
| LD50 | =3450 mg/kg | Rat | oral | - | ChemIDplus |
Adverse Outcome Pathway data across 5 assays (DPRA, KeratinoSens, hCLAT, LLNA, NESIL) aggregated from public sources.
Source: LLNA: Kern et al. (2010); DPRA: Urbisch et al. 2015 [DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.12.008]; KS: Urbisch et al. 2015 [DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.12.008]; hCLAT: Urbisch et al. 2015 [DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.12.008]; HPPT: [103] Greif N (1967): Cutaneous safety of fragrance material as measured by the maximization test.
4 human repeat insult patch tests aggregated from dermatological literature.
| Test Type | N | Sensitized | Dose µg/cm² | NESIL µg/cm² | Potency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRIPT | 101 | 0 | 29525 | 29525 | non-sensitizer |
| HMT | - | 0 | 3724.14 | - | - |
| HRIPT | - | 0 | 29527.56 | - | - |
| OECD_DA_Human | - | 0 | - | - | Non-sensitizer |
Cross-referenced EDC classifications, mechanism data, and dose-response evidence from EDLists, SIN List, and cosmetic-specific detail sources.
weak modulator
European Chemicals Agency REACH dossier and Substances of Very High Concern listing.
Additional regulatory detail beyond the 7-jurisdiction summary: Saudi SFDA, Korea MFDS, ASEAN ACD, Japan/Korea, Brazil/India, and cross-jurisdictional restriction entries.
| Jurisdiction | Status | Max % | Product Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| GCC | restricted | 0.001 | Leave-on products |
Cross-database dermal penetration: EPA Dryad physics-based, Roberts Mendeley permeation, and SCCS-aggregated measured values.
| Type | DA % | Method | Skin Model | SCCS Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| measured_in_vitro | 3.8-4.7 | In vitro; flow-through diffusion cells; [14C]-labelled | Human cadaver skin; occluded | Gilpin et al. 2010 (Dermatitis) (2010) |
International Fragrance Association standards per product category. Restriction: Restriction. Effective: 2021-02-10.
| Category | Max % | Category | Max % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (Lip products) | 0.4% | 7a (Deodorant – not spray) | 0.8% |
| 2 (Body spray) | 0.12% | 7b (Deodorant spray) | 0.8% |
| 3 (Body cream) | 0.4% | 8 (Face cream) | 0.13% |
| 4 (Fine fragrance) | 1.6% | 9 (Soap) | 2.0% |
| 5a (Body lotion) | 0.4% | 10a (Household – non-spray) | 2.0% |
| 5b (Face cream leave-on) | 0.4% | 10b (Household – spray) | No Restriction% |
| 5c (Hand cream) | 0.4% | 11a (Intimate – leave-on) | 0.13% |
| 5d (Baby cream) | 0.13% | 11b (Intimate – rinse) | 0.13% |
| 6 (Mouthwash) | 0.4% | 12 (Not for consumer exposure) | No Restriction% |
Reported concentration ranges per product category from SCCS/CIR/industry sources.
| Product Category | Typical Range | Max Reported | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Face Cream | 0.001–0.3 | 1 | CIR/VCRP |
10 property records from structured ingredient metadata.
Expert safety assessment and concern-level summary for Citronellol.
Public NOAEL study rows linked to Citronellol by CAS number or substance name.
| Absorption % | Method | Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| 3.8-4.7 | In vitro; flow-through diffusion cells; [14C]-labelled | 3:1 DEP/ethanol |
Same-CAS public records found in pharmaceutical data.
Same-CAS rows from the pharmaceutical spoke database.
Citronellol has a safety rating of "MODERATE" in our database. EU status: restricted. US status: permitted.
Citronellol EU regulatory status: restricted. Maximum allowed concentration: Declarable EU allergen; labelling required >10 ppm leave-on / >100 ppm rinse-off under Regulation (EU) 2023/1545; IFRA restrictions apply. This is based on EU Regulation 1223/2009 and its amendments.
Citronellol functions as: fragrance; antimicrobial. It is classified as a Fragrance in our database. CAS number: 106-22-9.
Citronellol also appears in industrial chemical safety and pharmaceutical data. The cross-vertical cards on this page render same-CAS public rows from the matched databases.
Check Citronellol compliance across multiple jurisdictions:
Scan any product label with Piro — our free ingredient scanner. Point your camera at the ingredients list and get instant safety scores for every ingredient.
Try Piro Free →Paste any INCI list into the Decoder for instant safety analysis, or calculate the Margin of Safety for Citronellol in your formulation.